Bret Hart had some pretty interesting words about Triple H, saying he's "never had a great match." So, let's put it to you, the commentariat:
1. How much credence do you give these statements by Hart, given he's on record as having a specific taste in what wrestling matches should be worked?
2. Buy or sell: Triple H has never had a great match.
3. If you were going to dispute the comments, which match or matches would you point to as evidence that Trips had at least one great match?
4. Buy or sell 2: Perceived politics are at the root of most of Triple H's criticisms in the ring, and thus unfairly cloud his match quality.
5. If you were Triple H, would these comments by Hart preclude you from working with him again?
1. How much credence do you give these statements by Hart, given he's on record as having a specific taste in what wrestling matches should be worked?
2. Buy or sell: Triple H has never had a great match.
3. If you were going to dispute the comments, which match or matches would you point to as evidence that Trips had at least one great match?
4. Buy or sell 2: Perceived politics are at the root of most of Triple H's criticisms in the ring, and thus unfairly cloud his match quality.
5. If you were Triple H, would these comments by Hart preclude you from working with him again?
